Here's the answer to the problem:

Tweet

Let the Muslims do what ever they want, where ever they want, with one condition!

In Canada (and the USA) politics and religion are kept as two separate unities. I think there might even be something about it in the constitution or the bill of rights  (which the USA and Canada adapted from the English in the first place "see the Bill of Rights 1699" which by the way did give us "Canadians" the right to bar arms)

Yet with the Qua'ran  their rules, regulations and belief's are considered to be LAWS of the land and held up and punishable in the courts of the land.

No other religious belief (or holy book)  does this!

Sooooooooooo.........

You ban any and all Muslims from holding political office (or a government position of any kind) in Canada and the United States, because they can't (according to their religious beliefs) hold this office with an impartial judgment to their duty's.

"As in: Age, Gender, Race, Religion."

And the kicker (if you will)


Muslims can lie under oath it's in the holy Quran!

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution (prevention), that ye may Guard yourselves from them (prevent them from harming you.) But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah." Surah 3: 28
According to this verse a Muslim can pretend to befriend infidels (in violation of the teachings of Islam) and display adherence with their unbelief to prevent them from harming him.
Under the concept of Takeyya and short of killing another human being, if under the threat of force, it is legitimate for Muslims to act contrary to their faith. The following actions are acceptable:

• Drink wine, abandon prayers, and skip fasting during Ramadan.
• Renounce belief in Allah.
• Kneel in homage to a deity other than Allah.
• Utter insincere oaths.

References:

http://islamcommentaries.com/index.htm
http://www.islamreview.com/articles/lying.shtml

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What that is say' is that you can't trust anything any of them are saying!!!!!

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Impartiality is a principle of justice holding that decisions should be based on objective criteria, rather than on the basis of bias, prejudice, or preferring the benefit to one person over another for improper reasons.



If they can't run for office then they can't change the rules of our country to benefit their religious beliefs! Let them be farmers or run a 24/7 store for all I care. (NO GOVERNMENT JOBS OF ANY KIND)!!!

End of problem!!!

Everyone Say's we should do something!

Well here is your chance!

I've given you the solution.

Up to you what you do with it :)

And if your going to scream "prejudice  and equal rights"!!!.

Prejudice is wanting to kill someone else because they don't believe in the same god as you!!

Equal rights is excepting all of mankind's rights (male and female) to believe in the god of his/her choice in a free and peaceful world!!!

And if you don't believe that, then you shouldn't be in our country!!! let alone in our government!!!!

Your Future and a look at past practice!

Tweet

People think I make this shit up......I don't,..... I just put it together so people will know.

This is an interesting clip taken from a documentary (The Holy War & Conquest), the short clip is about a city built by Muslims ( Originally a Phoenician city) where Christians, Jews, Muslims all lived together in peace.(back in medieval times) The city of Córdoba is located on the north bank of the Guadalquivir River in the southern region of Spain known today as Andalusia.

Maybe banning Muslims from public jobs/office is not such a bad idea.

If it was good enough for them in medieval time, then they should be able to except the barbarism of our actions now in this year of our Lord 2010 to try to preserve OUR way of life!

I'm not to sure about the slave part though..I don't think our bill of rights will allow that :)

In a nut shell, the Holy Quar'an for a Muslim that excepts Allah (Islam) as the one and only true God, is really a very loving and kind and peaceful religious belief. "IF YOU ARE A MUSLIM"

On the other side....if you are a non-Muslim, then you can be lied to, cheated, beheaded anything goes to save the faith of Islam and the Holy Qur'an, They don't care if you are Christian Jewish or a non-believer ALL non-Muslims are in the same boat! The Holy Qur'an actually refers to Non-Muslims as pigs or swine.

The Holy Quran gives them the right to lie, be it in court, to save their ass, to protect their religion!!

As in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution (prevention), that ye may Guard yourselves from them (prevent them from harming you.) But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah." Surah 3: 28
According to this verse a Muslim can pretend to befriend infidels (in violation of the teachings of Islam) and display adherence with their unbelief to prevent them from harming him.
Under the concept of Takeyya and short of killing another human being, if under the threat of force, it is legitimate for Muslims to act contrary to their faith. The following actions are acceptable:

• Drink wine, abandon prayers, and skip fasting during Ramadan.
• Renounce belief in Allah.
• Kneel in homage to a deity other than Allah.
• Utter insincere oaths.

References:

http://islamcommentaries.com/index.htm
http://www.islamreview.com/articles/lying.shtml

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Which means: THEY CAN'T BE TRUSTED!! Any of them!!!

The Holy Qur'an (Islam) or the belief in the Holy Qur'an (Muslims) should be kept out of our Canadian Government (Public Office of any kind) "This goes for the good old US of A to"

If not our future generations better get use to being on the slave side of the future Muslims free and peace loving society.

Bottom line:

Don't say nobody told you!!!!

Watch the short clip below and learn from the pass what could very well be Your future!

Just my opinion, but I like to express it while I still can :)

RColdguy: In search of the truth, in the name of freedom, for the truth will set us free!

I Believe in God! I just spell it with two O's is all :)

The War On Freedom

Tweet

Does anyone really know what we are fighting for?


We've lost all our freedom of rights in this war against terror!


So it only stands to reason that we can't be fighting for our freedom.


If the war is indeed against terrorism


Who is really causing the terror?


Who is really taking away our right to be free?.


And what does the word Terrorism really mean?


According to Wikipedia no one can decide what Terrorism really is.


As you listen to this audio, you might want to ask your self, who the real Terrorist are that are slowly taking away your rights to live in a free country.


The audio is short and to the point.


It's just my opinion and when you get right down to it... my opinion don't mean fuck all!


But at least I didn't sit and do nothing!


RColdguy: In search of the truth, in the name of freedom, for the truth will set us free!
==============================================

Terrorism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Terrorism is the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion.^[1] At present, the International community has been unable to formulate a universally agreed, legally binding, criminal law definition of terrorism.^[2][3] Common definitions of terrorism refer only to those violent acts which are intended to create fear (terror), are perpetrated for a religious, political or ideological goal, and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants (civilians).^{[citation needed]}
Some definitions also include acts of unlawful violence and war. The history of terrorist organizations suggests that they do not select terrorism for its political effectiveness.^[4] Individual terrorists tend to be motivated more by a desire for social solidarity with other members of their organization than by political platforms or strategic objectives, which are often murky and undefined.^[4]
The word "terrorism" is politically and emotionally charged,^[5] and this greatly compounds the difficulty of providing a precise definition. Studies have found over 100 definitions of “terrorism”.^[6][7] The concept of terrorism may itself be controversial as it is often used by state authorities to delegitimize political or other opponents,^[8] and potentially legitimize the state's own use of armed force against opponents (such use of force may itself be described as "terror" by opponents of the state).^[8][9]
Terrorism has been practiced by a broad array of political organizations for furthering their objectives. It has been practiced by both right-wing and left-wing political parties, nationalistic groups, religious groups, revolutionaries, and ruling governments.^[10] One form is the use of violence against noncombatants for the purpose of gaining publicity for a group, cause, or individual
=======================================================

God is becoming a dirty word!

Tweet

The catholic church would like you to believe that they are just isolated incidences that have been taken care of.

There not!

It's world wide!

And it's been going on for years!!!

The sad part is:

It's still going on today!!!


Pope Benedict XVI and the Vatican are turning the name of God in to a dirty word! and they don't seam to be to concerned about paying for their sin's in the hear after! Hell and damnation means nothing to these servants of God!

It's high time we showed them Hell on Earth!

They have punished us and damned us for our sins for generations, it's time our generation punished them for theirs!

It's time these people started paying for their sin's against humanity (more specifically) sin's against our children!

Believing is not a bad thing!!!

Believing in a corrupt organization run buy child molesters that thinks it's above the law, IS !!!

Pass this on!

It's the dirty truth, that the church doesn't want you to know!

--
RColdguy: In search of the truth, in the name of freedom, for the truth will set us free!

I Believe in God! I just spell it with two O's is all :)

=====================================================

http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/sex-crimes-and-the-vatican/

Sex Crimes and the Vatican

Created in 1962, a now infamous document was issued in secret to bishops. Called Crimen Sollicitationis, it outlined procedures to be followed by bishops when dealing with allegations of child abuse, homosexuality and bestiality by members of the clergy. It swore all parties involved to secrecy on pain of excommunication from the Catholic Church.

This document was reissued in 2001 by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and sent to all bishops. Yet rather than ordering more openness and cooperation with the authorities as demanded by both law enforcers and the victims, he reiterated its policies and ensured that the Code of Silence be applied to all cases of child abuse involving a priest. Cardinal Ratzinger also instructed that all cases should now be referred to his office directly and that he would maintain ‘exclusive competence’ over the handling of allegations. This is the Catholic Church’s policy to this day and Cardinal Ratzinger is now Pope Benedict XVI.

The policy laid out in the above document has led to systemic failure by the result that a significant number of priest have, in effect, been allowed to abuse again, and further children have been put at risk.

As the documentary explores, Colm O’Gorman is the man responsible for breaking open decades of abuse by Catholic Priests in Ireland in the BAFTA award-winning BBC special Suing the Pope. He links international ‘systemic evidence’ to argue the Vatican has a policy to cover up the sexual abuse of thousands of children across the world.

In Sex Crimes and the Vatican O’Gorman explores four separate cases internationally of widespread clerical abuse, putting the Roman Catholic Church on trial for the reckless endangerment of children. O’Gorman raises the question, ‘Is the Church in default of its obligation as a signatory to the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child?’