Friday, October 12, 2012


Well this would explain why I keep proving my Son In-law wrong all the time! 

Bottom line:

Do your own research and investigation don't listen to the Rich/Elite run Main Stream Media, as far as that goes don't listen to anyone!!

Don't listen to what I post on this blog (it's what I think is the truth, that alone doesn't make it true) and for Christ sake don't listen to my Son In-Law :)

Just remember:

If it looks or sounds to good to be true.

Chance's are, It' not True!!!

Look it up your self!!!


Posted on January 19, 2012

UPDATE: 1/19/2012 from article SNOPES EXPOSED – Heavily financed by George Soros – Once again the US Senate sold us out!

I’ve received a lot of flack about this article so I did additional research and further discovered what I already knew was true. is a fraud – plain and simple plus a multi-media forum for brainwashing an unsuspecting public.

Here for your information is another article from Before It’s News:


From Blogsphere

Snopes receives funding from an undisclosed source. The source is undisclosed because Snopes refuses to disclose that source. The Democratic Alliance, a funding channel for uber-Leftist (Marxist) Billionaires (George Soros etc.), direct funds to an “Internet Propaganda Arm” pushing these views. The Democratic Alliance has been reported to instruct Fundees to not disclose their funding source.

For the past few years has positioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the ‘tell-all final word’ on any comment, claim and email. But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind It is run by a husband and wife team – that’s right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It’s just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby. David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research.

The reason for the questions – or skepticism – is a result of claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issue when in fact they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the ‘true’ bottom of various issues.

A few months ago, when my State Farm agent Bud Gregg in Mandeville hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the Internet, ‘supposedly’ the Mikkelson’s claim to have researched this issue before posting their findings on In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort ‘ever’ took place. I personally contacted David Mikkelson (and he replied back to me) thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this and I gave him Bud Gregg’s contact phone numbers – and Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec’s at State Farm in Illinois who would have been willing to speak with him about it. He never called Bud. In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg that no one from ever contacted anyone with State Farm.

Yet, issued a statement as the ‘final factual word’ on the issue as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things – not!

Then it has been learned the Mikkelson’s are very Democratic (party) and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose agenda to discredit anything that appears to be conservative. There has been much criticism lately over the Internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson’s liberalism revealing itself in their website findings. Gee, what a shock?

So, I say this now to everyone who goes to to get what they think to be the bottom line fact ‘proceed with caution.’ Take what it says at face value and nothing more. Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to and read the sources for yourself. Plus,you can always search a subject and do the research yourself.

I have found this to be true also! Many videos of Obama I tried to verify on Snopes and they said they were False. Then they gave their liberal slant! I have suspected some problems with Snopes for some time now, but I have only caught them in half-truths. If there is any subjectivity they do an immediate full left rudder.

I have recently discovered that is owned by a flaming liberal and this man is in the tank for Obama. There are many things they have listed on their site as a hoax and yet you can go to You tube yourself and find the video of Obama actually saying these things. So you see, you cannot and should not trust, ever for anything that remotely resembles truth! I don’t even trust them to tell me if email chains are hoaxes anymore.

A few conservative speakers on MySpace told me about A few months ago and I took it upon myself to do a little research to find out if it was true. Well, I found out for myself that it is true. Anyway just FYI please don’t use anymore for fact checking and make your friends aware of their political leanings as well. Many people still is neutral and they can be trusted as factual. We need to make sure everyone is aware that is a hoax in itself.

Thank you,
Alan Strong
Alan Strong CEO/Chairman
Commercial Programming Systems, Inc.
4400 Coldwater Canyon Ave. Suite
200 Studio City, CA. 91604-5039

Read more:


Anonymous said...

So why should anyone believe you? Maybe you are the brainwashing one? And the hoax yourself.. Nothing and no one can be trusted except for witnessing things with your own eyes. You prove no point.. just a waste of typing.. as is this..

kunafooney said...

Reading this was like being bukkaked with stupid. Please get a grip before your own drek swallows you up.

Anonymous said...

Oh look, another conspiracy nerd, pretending he's important because he has special knowledge common people don't have! Get over yourself you half wit.. you aren't special, you don't have "special" knowledge.. get over it. It's life.

Anonymous said...

It's really surprising that someone who can't spell thinks that Snopes is a hoax. Also white letters on a black background is a good design choice.

Those were both sarcasm.

R.Coldguy said...

For One: I didn't say I could spell, that's what spell checkers are for, Right? SO, blame them. And just for the record, It's the whole English language I have a problem with not just spelling (it's fucked up!), but please, I'm 63 I have the equivalent of book one, I just post the information "I" think the world (the whole world! Not just the English speaking world)has a right and a need to see)

Two:I did not, and never have, said Snopes is a hoax! What I said is at the top of this posting signed Ray, as in LOOK SHIT UP YOUR SELF! signed Ray, oh and I did say my son in-law was wrong a lot and I'm sticking with that one!

Three: I like the white on black, I'm sorry I didn't check with you first to see what you would like, but hey I figured I would just go with my own personal preference seeing this is my blog and it is FREE(eg,NO ADVERTIZING) but hey I sure will take your advice if I ever decide to try to make money off the Truth!

If you wand to trust Snopes, Up to You! But as this posting points out Snopes is not always right! So Again People, Look it up your self!! and for Christ sake, Don't believe everything I post here, because I can't spell ya see and that apparently some how has an effect on the validity (is that a word:) of the articles posted here?

I closing:

And Please Anonymous, don't take that as sarcasm! It's just the plain simple truth, and the truth is, you don't have to come here!

So Don't!

Problem solved, No more trying to figure out if he meant fuck when he said phuck off.

So off ya go!!

Now that my friend is sarcasm :)

Love Always
Forever Peace


Anonymous said...

I never trusted snopes and sensed they received funding from the leeches w

john said...

Snopes has pretty good stuff, even with their leftist bent. But then Wikipedia is a colossal leftist op, and they will cut out anything your write to the contrary. Originally, it was said to be for anyone to make entries, but soon it was taken over by commie-central left bejesus--AND THEY KNOW BEST.
Nevertheless, you can learn a-plenty--and you sure won't get it from the Hollywood-wanna-be's of the media (commie symps, themselves).
Further, Snopes & Wiki exist in part because most people are too lazy to look up anything, and they certainly want a simple central location to check once, each time, have it your way, you deserve a break today.
Many people pass on worthless chain emails, too lazy to research. AND the "buy-my-Y2K-supply" PAYtriot sites not only pass on rumours, but don't even give credit to whom they copy, in their race to scoop. I suspect we should blame not just the human nature of sociopaths, but also dry boxed breakfast cereal, TV & especially public schools. And bank owners.
Crapya, it's captcha--

TL&C said...

GO Ray!! :))

Anonymous said...

You forgot about it being run by reptilians who log IP addresses to a file. They then trace you to your house, take you to a concentration camp and throw you in a time machine. Grab your tinfoil hats. Quack!

Miss Denier Slayer said...

Snopes is an insidious cancer, and only the truly pathetic, misguided and shallowly-politically motivated will say otherwise. You can see them answering here, in great numbers, like salivating magpies, agents of doom and ignorance ... Ignorance is Strength, is their motto.

I knew Snopes was scum when I saw their 'debunks' on Sandy Hook and the Boston Bombing should be enough to warrant their lifelong incarceration in stockades.

Anyone siding with evil on that row, propping up the fake-dead-kid myth deserves the very worst.

Those willing to sell out their fellow Americans at the bequest of such casual evil, they will not have their time in the sun for much longer.

Organizations like Snopes, CNN, they will be driven out of their dens when all comes to light.

This presidential administration has guaranteed that no liberal will be president again for decades.

And I voted for Obama twice.

Anonymous said...

It's a real pet peeve of mine when I try to engage someone in a conversation, often political, and they simply answer: No, I read on Snopes that that's not real. So somehow the conversation is suppose to end there. The initial conversation is lost and becomes a convo about whether Snopes is 100% reliable.. which is ridiculous.

Do your own research and you'll find that snopes has been wrong on countless posts.

Anonymous said...

Miss denier slayer. Your name is stupid. Your ideas are stupid and delusional. Seek help, post haste. Also the owner of the blog or whatever trash this is delusional as well. I realize it upsets you when someone has actual facts, but get over it.

Anonymous said...

> Calls snopes fraudulent

> Uses Beforeitsnews as a source

I'm going to have to call bullshit on this entire article.

Anonymous said...

Spelling aside you just can't type legible English correct can't even help what you typed. A drunk person can talk better than that.

Anonymous said...

(Continued thought from my above post)......

How do you expect for anyone to take something you say seriously when:

1. You have many spelling and grammatically errors

2. You try and debunk a website as being one-sided in the political world but in the exact same breath you cite many other one-sided political websites. You have zero credible information by doing that.

So Ray in hopes that you see this (and by the way I am not a liberal fan at all for what's it is worth to you) please try and make your pleas to people more informative by first typing legibly. Second, post with more credible sources and not other super biased sources.

R.Coldguy said...

Well I have to agree with you, my spelling and my abuse of the English language is atrocious! Funny how you could get so much out of me and my personality from what little I said, because my part stops at
The only pint I was really trying to make is, My son in-law, as with many others, pullout their cell phone look up snoops and that's their final argument! SNOOPS IS NOT RIGHT ALL THE TIME! As the artificial below my miss spelled words points out!

My message to people out there that are looking for an answer, LOOK IT UP YOUR SELF!! SNOOPS IS NOT RIGHT ALL THE TIME!

I hope this has cleared up any problems you were having with my RE-POST of an aurtacal that clearly has a link to that articles right at the top! I didn't write the articles I only posted the free beer part!!!

Anonymous said...

Snopes is always right and is accepted as expert testimony in any court of law.

All hail the Might Snopes!

Anonymous said...

I frequently find that the information which has been 'debunked' on Snopes is actually true and has been backed by scientific evidence. I've often done my own research on certain subjects as well, providing sufficient evidence that others can research themselves, only to have people come back with, 'Snopes debunked this theory, end of story!'

I find it quite disturbing how lazy and ignorant people, rather than doing their own research, simply turn to Snopes for an answer. The information on Snopes is actually quite biased in favor of the government and large corporations, Monsanto and Big Pharma being a few examples. This alone discredits their opinions in my eyes.

Anonymous said...

The fierceness with which these haters are attacking is amazing. Reading Snopes with a critical mind will tell you what is true and what is not. When something is touted as fact without any sort of credible basis or source, you're right to question it. Every. Single. Time.

Anonymous said...

Your writing is riddled with typos. This many typos will immediately make your point unreliable. How much can you trust somebody who can't write well or use propper grammar? I recommend proofreading, employing somebody to proofread it, and/or stating in the beginning that english is your second language.